Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH580
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 23:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 65.9
1-Core 182
2-Core 329
100% 192 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 740
79% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Device(1A58 201B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1700
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.5% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 173
Parallax 106
96% 132 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 117
Splatting 107
100% 126 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 135%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3069 2003 1758 1792 1842 1783 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 2,982
Write 4,004
Mixed 3,009
SusWrite 2,041
680% 3,009 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 101
347% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,119
837% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 401%
Great: 427%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 38
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 360 15.5" 1280 720 TMX1560 TL156VDXP02-0
Typical Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421 Builds (Compare 628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback