Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 169 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 558 55% 448 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 793 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	8% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 5.78 9% 8.44 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 9.23 Splatting 6.57 6% 8.19 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB 2,100 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: DB6Q Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.2% Below average	Read 136 Write 128 Mixed 133 30% 132 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 15.3 55% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 91.3 DQ Write 91.6 DQ Mixed 52 50% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 102%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 56GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 599 Write 929 Mixed 646 163% 725 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 19 83% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 65.6 55% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 236%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: D781 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 140 Write 141 Mixed 128 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.27 96% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 98%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: D781 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 101 Write 138 Mixed 95.5 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 4.78 4K Mixed 0.47 178% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:85 43 D3-62MA104SQV-999 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:85 43 D3-62MA104SQV-999 98GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.8% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16