HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory8.1 GB free of 10.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 08 '18 at 06:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 38
2-Core 76
42% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 147
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 27.8
19% 26.9 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 31.8
22% 26.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MG03ACA200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: FL1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 82.2
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.004
79% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
42% Average
Read 78.1
Write 67.9
Mixed 37.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.48
99% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5471-012.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5471-012.A00LF ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback