Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 12:45
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 259
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 830
78% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 90.9
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 84.6
74% 88.6 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 73.2
70% 88.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1754 1473 1472 1507 1506 1247 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,899
Write 2,007
Mixed 1,697
SusWrite 1,493
400% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 64.1
225% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 769
575% 774 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 271%
Great: 334%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30023 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1968 2095 2091 2085 1870 1876 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 1,844
Write 2,046
Mixed 1,998
SusWrite 1,997
446% 1,971 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 89.6
286% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 897
680% 923 MB/s
Poor: 233%
This bench: 327%
Great: 504%
Asmt ASM105x 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 398 397 397 389 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 392
Write 392
Mixed 363
SusWrite 390
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 162
122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 77%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 454
Mixed 407
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 50.1
178% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 237
216% 329 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
292GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 189 189 190 192 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 130
Write 93.4
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 188
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
682GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 113
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 84
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 82%
WD My Passport 070A 500GB
257GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 54.8
Write 29.3
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 33.6
44% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 38.5" 1280 720 SPT0FCD Sceptre Y40
Typical PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback