TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231014
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 00:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,130
101% 853 Pts
64-Core 2,167
134% 2,167 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 94.3%
 Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 211
Parallax 222
188% 221 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 154
Splatting 135
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 155%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zns512g NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10410106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 821 472 621 359 340 346 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,318
Write 461
Mixed 1,308
SusWrite 493
199% 895 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 77.3
269% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 654
599% 930 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 214%
 Great: 216%
Maxsun 2TB SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 1050 1294 1297 1249 1254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 1,311
Mixed 1,257
SusWrite 1,186
288% 1,276 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 74.1
271% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1482
DQ Write 1,122
DQ Mixed 1,239
943% 1,281 MB/s
Poor: 267% ↑
This bench: 267%
 Great: 629%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SED3200U1832 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 39.2
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 135%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 47 120 35" 1280 720 PDA0350 PF34UB5
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,397x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples689x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples335x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples285x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples282x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples276x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples123x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples122x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples368x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples156x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples146x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback