Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	46.9 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '23 at 20:54
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 192 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 615 59% 484 Pts	64-Core 785 49% 785 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1454) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.2% Poor	Lighting 25.9 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 25.3 21% 27.2 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 28.5 Splatting 17.8 19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 435 424 426 429 432 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 422 Mixed 363 SusWrite 430 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 37.7 128% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 350 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 708GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 438 429 427 432 436 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 433 Mixed 385 SusWrite 434 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 38.5 132% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 353 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C15 7x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 7 of 8 slots used 56GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 30 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 28.8 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 19.5 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	20	16	180	29.5"	2560 1057	MSI3CB4 MSI MAG301CR2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	766x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	197x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	88x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16