Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6006U 47,111 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 82.8 42% 65.5 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 116 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1E10) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 0.1 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingstonSA400S37 240GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 112 121 106 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 364 Write 142 Mixed 289 SusWrite 111 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 4.1 47% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 13.4 43% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8G2666MHZ 1x8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.5% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	14	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	50x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	17x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	8x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	5x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	2x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	26x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	13x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	8x