Gigabyte GA-Z170-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 08 '16 at 22:48
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 456
61% 455 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Inte SSDSC2BW120H6 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 486
Write 196
Mixed 254
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 18.8
144% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 47.3
77% 147 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 84%
Samsun HD321KJ 320GB
198GB free
Firmware: CP10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 72.8
Write 81.9
Mixed 77.3
58% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.38
93% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback