HP 500-202eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-202eo  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 05:37
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 45.7
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 51.9
30% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 50.7
8-Core 53.6
7% 52.2 Pts
64-Core 57.1
4% 57.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.09.04
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 10.7
6% 8.83 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 6.4
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 197 151 189 190 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 308
Write 224
Mixed 252
SusWrite 188
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 16.3
66% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 120
103% 154 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
453GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 114 103 120 113 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 125
Write 98.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 112
72% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 88%
General UDisk 537GB
497GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14.1
Mixed 5.2
9% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 35%
ST350041 2AS 500GB
186GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 24 27 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 28.6
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 25.4
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.1% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 27" 1280 720 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical 500-202eo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-202eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback