Notebook P95_HR

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Notebook P95_HR (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P95_HR
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '17 at 13:35
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 70% 127 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 589 61% 490 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q) 9,069 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Clevo(1558 9501) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8859 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Lighting 82.1 Reflection 93.1 Parallax 72.8 67% 82.7 fps	MRender 81.8 Gravity 72.5 Splatting 79 64% 77.8 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 69%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 40 257699414067 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 850081235 (F7) Unknown 100 100 26705614 (F8) Unknown 100 100 10714095 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1264 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	59.2% Above average	Read 468 Write 321 Mixed 330 83% 373 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 11.1 66% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 48.2 DQ Mixed 10.6 15% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.M16FH 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 22.1 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 12.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P95_HR Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

System: Notebook P95_HR

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 61%, 9,069 samples	27x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	15x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	4x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	4x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	3x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GBHynixBench 70%, 3,373 samples	3x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 742 samples	3x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 1,242 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16