Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120531
Uptime	10.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '23 at 07:52
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 157 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 418 43% 345 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 28.2 16% 24.3 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 23.1 21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 79 77 81 84 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 117 Write 112 Mixed 126 SusWrite 81 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 24.7 88% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 32 34% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 477GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 87 87 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 84.8 SusWrite 85.7 73% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.8 174% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	390x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	206x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $902

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16