HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140802
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '23 at 10:14
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 50
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 47.5
28% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 40.7
8-Core 68.6
7% 54.7 Pts
64-Core 75.2
5% 75.2 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 600GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 467
Mixed 478
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 8.7
30% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 43.5
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 44.2
32% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 102%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
45GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.1
Write 6.8
Mixed 12.1
26% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 647648-071 2x4GB
2 of 24 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 4.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350p Gen8 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 239% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback