ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS H81H3-M4  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151021
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 194
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 338
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 7E44) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4568
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R530E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 409 257 187 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 382
Write 378
Mixed 313
SusWrite 261
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 26.8
113% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 87.5
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 57.6
80% 140 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
420GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 81.7
Write 96.6
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 88.2
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 10GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 8.1
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback