TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Killer  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 20:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 109
2-Core 197
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 541
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 78.7%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.50.20.01
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 81.2
48% 68 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 46.9
47% 59.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 48%
 Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 17 79 80 17 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 300
Write 106
Mixed 159
SusWrite 59.4
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 24.1
95% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 96.5
85% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 51.1%
 Great: 85%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
572GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 408 416 363 94 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 437
Write 408
Mixed 381
SusWrite 321
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 23.1
105% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 1.4
75% 176 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 80.4%
 Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
469GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 136 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 136
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 72.4%
 Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 0420 F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 0420 F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 0420 F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 55%
 Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel  $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples102x
Core i7-4770KIntel  $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples96x
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples43x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples35x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples26x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples23x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples18x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung  $65Bench 96%, 217,115 samples15x
RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback