HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 710
64% 538 Pts
64-Core 3,156
195% 3,156 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 179
Parallax 167
151% 177 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
119% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 547 976 970 1119 1165 1243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 2,034
Write 422
Mixed 708
SusWrite 1,003
229% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 10.3
82% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 166%
Great: 435%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
236GB free
Firmware: 2H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 275 265 284 287 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 437
Write 167
Mixed 180
SusWrite 264
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.8
45% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 102%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 5.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 23 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 323
Write 27.6
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 21.7
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB1-CRC 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 52.1
MC Mixed 49.3
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback