Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '17 at 23:51
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88 21,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 78 1-Core 61 2-Core 94.6 50% 77.9 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 197 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 37.6 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 36.4 31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2789 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 385 (A5) Unknown 100 100 87482 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 22 (AE) Unknown 100 100 147 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 25 210453987353 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 73 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 186 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4249798161 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4577818505	38% Below average	Read 368 Write 199 Mixed 289 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 7.18 34% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 33.9 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 9.28 11% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 56%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 131 118 4425 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2404 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19091 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2197 (C0) Power-off retract count 196 196 3243 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 129 129 213740 (C2) HDA temperature 121 96 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	81.9% Excellent	Read 139 Write 146 Mixed 141 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.27 119% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 407GB free Firmware: JP3OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 90 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 95 (03) Spinup time 119 100 25790644543 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4065 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13326 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3859 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 82 8656100 (BD) vendor-specific 83 83 17 (BE) vendor-specific 77 43 320274455 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4066 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4066 (C2) HDA temperature 253 122 244813922327 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.7% Good	Read 128 Write 115 Mixed 117 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.41 105% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 OCZ3SOE1600LV2G OCZ3SOE1600LV2G 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 11 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 84.3 48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16