Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook W65KJ1_KK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 15:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 404
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 651A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8813
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 35.4
35% 36.3 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.9
31% 38 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
443GB free
Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 474
Write 322
Mixed 326
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 20.3
88% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 44.8
78% 151 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
103GB free
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 469
Write 176
Mixed 261
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 19.3
103% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 48.7
92% 185 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 104%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,190
Write 622
Mixed 711
185% 841 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 31.5
168% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 31.3
103% 230 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 150%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FA 8502 2400 C15 Series 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback