Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 20:32
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1405T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 89.5
48% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 266
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
MSI(1462 3050) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 41
28% 35.5 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 36
26% 30.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia MIRROR 596.17G 640GB
571GB free (System drive)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 72.1
Write 8.77
Mixed 15.7
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.37
75% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U64F9333G F6451U64F9333G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback