Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 124 52% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 148 22% 159 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 570M 621 User benchmarks, average bench 9% MSI(1462 10BD) 3GB CLim: 575 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 13.9 Parallax 11.1 8% 11.7 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 10 10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 71 79 80 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 154 Write 101 Mixed 104 SusWrite 73.7 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 3.1 29% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 81.1 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 92.3 69% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 61%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45 3,466 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 525GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FSFF65F-C8KM9 4x4GB 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.3% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 12 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 570MNvidiaBench 9%, 621 samples	1x

SSD
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	1x

RAM
FSFF65F-C8KM9 4x4GBUnknownBench 44%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $302

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16