HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210428
Uptime308.3 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 18:21
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 211
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 557
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 18.3
16% 18.2 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.5
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 543 519 472 525 531 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 2,378
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,295
SusWrite 547
324% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 44.7
155% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 164
177% 313 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 194%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
4GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 409
Mixed 377
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 34.3
121% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 138
124% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
51GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 385 369 401 409 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 405
Mixed 348
SusWrite 385
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 36.6
123% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 124
114% 185 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 124%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB
15GB free
Firmware: M603
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 359
Mixed 306
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 29.3
96% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 121
111% 178 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 110%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MAY-1AE1ZABHA 512GB
1GB free
Firmware: M506
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 357
Mixed 281
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 26.7
91% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 108
96% 151 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 104%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Ex2 128GB
23GB free, PID 1407
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 174 187 189 187 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 217
Write 188
Mixed 43
SusWrite 184
203% 158 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback