Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 22:29
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 165
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 294
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 40.6
36% 43.7 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 35.8
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 652 322 318 340 341 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,701
Write 1,535
Mixed 1,416
SusWrite 387
282% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 42.7
132% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 283
226% 324 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 149%
Great: 271%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 177 172 175 181 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 424
Write 244
Mixed 242
SusWrite 170
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 36.9
120% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 211
189% 289 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
540GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 85 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 77.6
Write 52.4
Mixed 48
SusWrite 83.3
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
295GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 77 77 78 75 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 64.9
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 71.7
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 161 168 167 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 162
Mixed 109
SusWrite 163
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
7GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 157
Write 26.8
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 26.2
61% 61 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.5
199% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
WD Elements SE 25FF 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 102
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.5
279% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2666C19-8GNT Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH F4-2666C19-8GNT 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback