Huananzhi Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuananzhi Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-T8
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 176
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 675
61% 511 Pts
64-Core 1,355
84% 1,355 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Zotac(19DA 1260) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 53
Parallax 47.3
30% 45.6 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 36.4
35% 43.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 392 200 202 187 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 937
Mixed 944
SusWrite 349
195% 876 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 46.3
150% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 518
354% 438 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 137%
Great: 173%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
137GB free
Firmware: P1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 445 378 320 186 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 296
Write 112
Mixed 103
SusWrite 330
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.9
52% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 15.2
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 19.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback