bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory352GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 352GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory234.2 GB free of 352 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 06:14
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8249C
None, 1 CPU, 25 cores, 50 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 111
42% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 453
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk 960GB
862GB free
Firmware: NVMDV001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1284 1385 1613 1008 1655 1674 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
244% Outstanding
Read 2,659
Write 2,122
Mixed 794
SusWrite 1,436
390% 1,753 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 19.8
88% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 512
389% 523 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 244%
Great: 281%
Virtual HD 137GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 11 11 8.4 8.3 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 156
Write 8.8
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 9.8
33% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 190 192 170 154 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 200
Mixed 118
SusWrite 178
128% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2
345% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Virtual HD 564GB
444GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 145 145 148 145 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 352GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 31754 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 34
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback