MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 20:01
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 32.1
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 119
38% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 194
23% 179 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D9) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 30.1
26% 30.8 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 20.4
22% 28.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid SAMSUNG MZYTY256 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT6
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 317
Write 288
Mixed 222
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 10.6
35% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 130
107% 151 MB/s
Amd-raid HGST HTS725050A7 500GB
98GB free
Firmware: GH2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 101 102 115 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
Read 76
Write 87.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 104
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback