Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '17 at 13:38
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 159
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 493
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 55.4
38% 47.8 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 39.1
40% 49.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 476
Write 330
Mixed 322
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 16.7
97% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 16.8
30% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
55GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 67.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 57.7
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.47
100% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB
28GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 61.7
Mixed 58.2
45% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.47
98% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
25GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 83
Write 81.1
Mixed 96.4
66% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.33
80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 70%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00A8LB0 1TB
121GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 30.2
Mixed 29
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback