TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355V5C-S03TR
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 11:41
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 71.1
40% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 66.4
8-Core 71.2
9% 68.8 Pts
64-Core 70.6
4% 70.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 45.1%
 Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
2.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 3.1
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.68%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120G B 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V830
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 159 177 176 200 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 195
Write 201
Mixed 195
SusWrite 174
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 25.1
87% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 73
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 113
78% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 49.2%
 Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 27.9%
 Great: 36%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

CPU
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples9x
A10-4600M APUAMDBench 43%, 5,886 samples9x
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 38%, 175 samples8x
GPU
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples17x
Radeon HD 7660GAMDBench 4%, 4,227 samples9x
Radeon HD 7640GAMDBench 3%, 7,719 samples6x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples4x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples2x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples1x
RAM
CT102464BF160B.M16 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 10GBMicronBench 22%, 3 samples3x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples3x
M471B5773EB0-CK0 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 201 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback