Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 114
52% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 163
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
0% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 6.4 19 4 3.6 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7.9
4% 5.53 MB/s
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback