Fujitsu AMILO Pa 1510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu AMILO Pa 1510  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU AMILO Pa 1510
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 08:22
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-64
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 63.1
36% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 61.9
8-Core 63.1
8% 62.5 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 87.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 93
SusWrite 87.8
20% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 13.5
59% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 15.9
16% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 28%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback