Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 144 2-Core 289 97% 176 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 527 73% 542 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 49.2 Parallax 39.4 28% 41.2 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 28.3 28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03150010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 135 127 126 114 112 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 143 Write 112 Mixed 308 SusWrite 123 39% 171 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 42.8 151% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 30.4 DQ Mixed 76.4 60% 86.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 04EF Team-Elite-2400 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2900, 2900, 2900, 2900 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	101% Outstanding	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 31.6 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 31.2 91% 31.9 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3733 C17 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 97%, 572 samples	16x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $569