HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8615
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 17:49
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 23
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 111
36% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 402
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 8615) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 124 121 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 404
Write 354
Mixed 350
SusWrite 134
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 24.1
82% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 108
102% 159 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 95%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 115 112 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 129
Write 106
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 113
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
213% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-16GRS Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2400, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.3
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 299
13% 299 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx Builds (Compare 684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback