QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.6 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 14:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Graphics
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 321
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 983
100% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 100%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 191GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 353 362 360 357 360 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
Read 153
Write 95.5
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 354
39% 171 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 9.8
39% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 15.3 MB/s
Red Hat VirtIO 451GB
71GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 223 245 212 154 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
Read 290
Write 330
Mixed 333
SusWrite 231
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 20.7
68% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 154
111% 144 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 16GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 34.7
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 34.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback