HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1960
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 03:48
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 133
57% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1960) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 430
Mixed 298
87% 392 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 30.6
100% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 289
233% 326 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
SMI USB disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 4
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.3
7% 7.18 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5173DB0-YK0 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback