Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 02:43
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 100
52% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 146
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 3.5 28 3.7 68 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 318
Write 352
Mixed 286
SusWrite 55.5
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 12.8
47% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 45.9
39% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 60%
Multiple Card Reader 126GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 7.9 8.6 7.6 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 18
Write 10.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 8.3
16% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.4
167% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 12%
SSD SSD 4TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.8 13 13 9.7 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Read 14
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 9.1
10% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB
740GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 21.2
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 16.3
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback