LG R590-P.BE54P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG R590-P.BE54P1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 06:10
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 64
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 46.6
32% 44.4 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 159
14% 117 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Device(1854 0832) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.5
3% 3.45 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 262
Write 183
Mixed 204
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 7.92
35% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 62.8
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 32.5
30% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273BH1-CH9 M471B5773CHS-YH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback