Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '22 at 18:57
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 76.5 1-Core 58.3 2-Core 116 52% 83.7 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 302 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3552) 2GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 45 26% 36.2 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 34.7 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 214 224 180 198 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 449 Write 117 Mixed 157 SusWrite 190 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 24.5 105% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 69.8 81% 144 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 321 320 322 322 321 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 454 Mixed 400 SusWrite 333 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 57.9 194% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 261 196% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBZL F3-14900CL9-4GBZL F3-14900CL9-4GBZL F3-14900CL9-4GBZL 16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 9.6 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16