Gigabyte Z170X-GAMING 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z170X-GAMING 3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 28 '17 at 07:20
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 235
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 656
71% 563 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 40.5
40% 45.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 37
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-000L2 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT26L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 511
Write 259
Mixed 328
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 16.2
124% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 15
89% 207 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85%
Great: 91%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 154
Mixed 150
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.18
82% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 96%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
2TB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 120
Write 142
Mixed 127
171% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.41
93% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
1GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42% Average
Read 96.8
Write 96.5
Mixed 98.2
126% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.36
89% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 2,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170X-GAMING 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback