Asus G10AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus G10AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G10AC
Memory17.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '17 at 15:32
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 624
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1405 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 19% Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 177
Write 78
Mixed 90.3
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 10
93% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 82.3
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 23.3
35% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
425GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 121
Write 131
Mixed 82.2
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.17
70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
354GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 84.8
Write 78.2
Mixed 21.9
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.51
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 9905471-017.A00LF 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback