HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81FB
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 17:30
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 70.2
39% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 79.1
8-Core 76.7
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 78.1
5% 78.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 81FB) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.64 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
663GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 97
Write 102
Mixed 107
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.22
74% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 10.1
Mixed 10.5
17% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.18
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.11
16% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback