Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire XC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire XC-780(KBL)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170221
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 192 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 347 51% 372 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230 43,922 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Gigabyte(1458 40AA) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.5% Very good	Lighting 104 Reflection 85.2 Parallax 90.1 85% 93.2 fps	MRender 83.6 Gravity 73.6 Splatting 66 60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB 4,820 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 35.6 Write 301 Mixed 20.6 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 18.6 57% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 44.6 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 133 80% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 27GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 217 209 202 194 188 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 443 Mixed 423 SusWrite 220 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 56.8 184% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 327 246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 128%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB 5,105 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 48GB free Firmware: MX15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 72.5 Write 12.7 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 13.2 21% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 22.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 20.7 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	154x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	106x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	63x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	90x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	87x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	37x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	24x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	15x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	11x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	30x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	26x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16