Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory117.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 11:10
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 808
75% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 885B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 102
Parallax 91.4
83% 98.5 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 80.4
74% 91.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$233
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1933 1873 1837 1886 1601 1987 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 1,979
Mixed 1,010
SusWrite 1,853
385% 1,716 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 33.2
149% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 683
558% 810 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 277%
Great: 389%
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$180
1TB free
Firmware: 42A0S63C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1644 1647 1650 1654 1661 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,017
Write 1,508
Mixed 135
SusWrite 1651
296% 1,328 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 59.8
210% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 584
576% 927 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 295%
Great: 379%
HPT DISK 0_0 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 223 213 219 225 223 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 60% Great: 116%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB
791GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 154 150 152 145 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 161
Write 173
Mixed 123
SusWrite 148
205% 151 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1
329% 4.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 1.5
247% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 99%
JMicron Generic DISK00 12TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 35 35 35 30 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 14.8
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 32.1
28% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 29.9
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 11.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback