Intel S1200RP_SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel S1200RP_SE  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150701
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '17 at 21:20
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 158
57% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 538
56% 450 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
580GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 149
Write 149
Mixed 110
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.37
146% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 173
Mixed 116
113% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.21
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.35
143% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 14.1
Mixed 16.6
21% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.99
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.52
56% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 9%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
3GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 41.2
Mixed 28.4
46% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.38
89% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965432-083.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S1200RP_SE Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S1200RP_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback