MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '17 at 15:07
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 161
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 287
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 54
37% 46.5 fps
MRender 53.6
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 38.1
38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 261
Write 125
Mixed 158
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 9.24
80% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 13.2
36% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
780GB free
Firmware: CC9F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 153
Write 114
Mixed 97.3
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.21
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
109GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 73.3
Mixed 35
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
36GB free
Firmware: P22OA70A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 48.4
Write 49.5
Mixed 38.6
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.25
70% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMY32GX3M4A1600C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B75A-G43 GAMING (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback