Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '22 at 18:50
Run Duration	535 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 76.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 275 89% 164 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 1,102 99% 836 Pts	64-Core 2,097 130% 2,097 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Asus(1043 0577) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.5% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 138 Parallax 203 97% 153 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 129 Splatting 92.9 90% 112 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 388 389 368 367 383 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,304 Write 1,695 Mixed 1,278 SusWrite 434 265% 1,178 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 218 4K Mixed 85.4 299% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,164 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 927 632% 798 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 253%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 16GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 271 282 276 243 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	50% Above average	Read 228 Write 238 Mixed 234 SusWrite 288 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 19.2 53% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 140 107% 142 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 124%
Samsung MZYTE256 256GB 205GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 217 220 206 214 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.3% Average	Read 188 Write 193 Mixed 129 SusWrite 214 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 9.7 54% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 51.3 55% 90.2 MB/s

WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 135GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 88 87 84 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 113 Write 111 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 85.8 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 114GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 137 135 127 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 134 Write 105 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 133 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 53GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 119 144 149 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 78.3 Write 73 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 139 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 39GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 79 74 72 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 74 Write 79.5 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 73.5 50% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 84%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 120GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 91 91 91 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 62.7 Write 85 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 91.7 116% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.2 112% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB 1,199 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2.5TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 131 130 131 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 146 Write 127 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 130 136% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 53%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 36GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 24.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 4.5 25% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA HDWA130 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 140GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 27.4 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 4.3 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 21%
WD My Passport 0741 1TB 1,389 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 33GB free, PID 0741 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 76 78 76 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 81.6 Write 86.2 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 76.6 101% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 26GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 16 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 47.9 Write 66 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 14.1 51% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 43%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 35GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 64 63 63 62 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 92.9 Write 54.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 62.2 82% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 43%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 5GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.7% Terrible	Read 28.2 Write 18.5 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 4 24% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 47GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 11 13 16 16 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 2GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.81% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 25.3 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 4 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.7 MB/s

TOSHIBA HDWA130 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 28GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 25.3 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 3.9 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 3GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 4.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.89% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 23.9 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 3.9 26% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 52% 0.57 MB/s

TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 431 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 76GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 28.5 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 26.9 35% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 24GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 18.2 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 3.9 24% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 38%
TOSHIBA MK3265GSXN 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 19GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.1% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 33.3 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 37.7 46% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB 8,162 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 31.1 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 28.3 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,621x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,227x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	854x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	820x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	700x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	622x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	304x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	374x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $690

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16