Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 94.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 215 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 416 55% 414 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 42.6 Parallax 40.3 36% 42.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 28.9 29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 672GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 397 407 423 412 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 378 Write 448 Mixed 376 SusWrite 387 90% 397 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 47.8 155% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.6 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 57.9 49% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL F3-12800CL9-2GBRL F3-12800CL9-2GBRL F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 8GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.5% Good	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 19.7 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 20.2 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 58.2 69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,087 samples	15x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	7x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	6x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $541

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16