Biostar N68S3+

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	6.53% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar N68S3+ (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 19:55
Run Duration	473 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 255 3,508 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 45.4 2-Core 90.8 46% 70.3 Pts	4-Core 90 8-Core 79.3 12% 84.7 Pts	64-Core 85.6 5% 85.6 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 7.73 Parallax 8.69 6% 7.81 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 7.7 6% 6.82 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.53% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 11.6 Mixed 14 4% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.44 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 0.82 15% 7.74 MB/s	DQ Read 1.78 DQ Write 21 DQ Mixed 0.89 4% 7.88 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 118%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 119GB free Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	32% Below average	Read 55.4 Write 55.7 Mixed 53.5 41% 54.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.29 79% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 35%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 111GB free Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 57.6 Write 48.7 Mixed 54.2 40% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.27 96% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 35%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 61GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 49.5 Mixed 57.2 42% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.29 74% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 164GB free, PID 0216 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 20.2 Mixed 23.5 30% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.31 66% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 19%
USB 2.0 Storage Device 250GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 108GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 66GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 19.7 Mixed 23.9 30% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown V01D3LF4GB26826813 Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.7% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.7 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68S3+ Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3+

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	5x
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	12x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x
I T LCS-128L9S 128GBLiteonBench 72%, 3 samples	2x

RAM
99U5471-001.A00LF Corsair CML4GX3M1A1600C9 6GBKingstonBench 25%, 5 samples	2x
9905402-532.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 676 samples	2x
2x8GBSamsungBench 62%, 17,576 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16