Zoostorm 7200-5145B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5145B (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte B85-HD3-A
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '21 at 17:18
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 188 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 551 55% 450 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22FC) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 90.3 54% 73.2 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 71.1 Splatting 45.6 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 174 172 154 168 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 458 Write 169 Mixed 179 SusWrite 169 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 11.9 85% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 77.6 83% 138 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 61%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 110GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 113 105 87 87 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 76.9 Write 74 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 96.2 56% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 104GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 124 Write 110 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 91.6 73% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 1201 R538G1601U2S-UGO 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.3% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 17.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5145B Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Zoostorm 7200-5145B

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

RAM
BLS4G3D169DS3.16FE 4x4GBCrucialBench 59%, 371 samples	2x
CT102464BA160B.C16 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 51%, 63 samples	1x
CT102464BA160B.C16 1201 R538G1601U2S-UGO 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 3 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Zoostorm 7200-5145B

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Zoostorm 7200-5145B

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)