TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 06:08
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 245
90% 158 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 741
75% 607 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 91%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 55.9
45% 55.2 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 43.5
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 44%
 Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNI-82A 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 869
Write 906
Mixed 892
199% 889 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 59.1
197% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 441
387% 582 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 186%
Suneast SE800 NGFF 256GB
116GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 373 397 401 378 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 459
Write 396
Mixed 336
SusWrite 388
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 25.5
109% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 43.5
76% 145 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 83.7%
 Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: JU000D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 99 133 135 134 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 137
Write 115
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 48.9%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples12,314x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples3,622x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples42x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples8,431x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples1,610x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,539x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples2,470x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBWDCBench 167%, 6,790 samples2,166x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GBNvmeBench 156%, 3,698 samples1,650x
RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples2,338x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples1,707x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples1,628x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback