Asrock H110 Pro BTC+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110 Pro BTC+  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '17 at 22:24
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 86.9
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 156
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 170
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 61GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
Read 152
Write 12.9
Mixed 10.3
42% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.13
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 1.3
269% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
0GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 155
Write 4
Mixed 13.2
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.04
29% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110 Pro BTC+ Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H110 Pro BTC+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback