Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '17 at 20:00
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 148 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 450 45% 364 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 154 Parallax 148 100% 141 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 147 Splatting 121 105% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4442 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2779 (B1) Unknown 98 98 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 630 (EB) Unknown 99 99 478 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19279947061	91.8% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 383 Mixed 407 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 36.3 132% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 78 82% 137 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 89GB free Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 100 73 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2211 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 57 (A9) Unknown 100 100 36 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 40 (AE) Unknown 100 100 547 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 100 231928234020 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 9682 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4564 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4859	72% Very good	Read 371 Write 409 Mixed 438 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 5.36 89% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 30.7 63% 129 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 86%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 64GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6276 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4926 (B1) Unknown 97 97 107 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1382 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14312881767	70.2% Very good	Read 494 Write 308 Mixed 378 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 19.2 84% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 77.1 DQ Mixed 63.2 68% 117 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 76%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 437GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 163 163 93 (03) Spinup time 130 130 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3734 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 46 46 155 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 6251 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2430 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 538 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 37263 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 214749151260 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	32.7% Below average	Read 98.3 Write 15.9 Mixed 26.7 35% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.1 28% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 203GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 156 131 1200 (04) Start/Stop count 11 11 89086 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9221 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8498 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 536 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2711 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 340835 (C2) HDA temperature 118 91 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41% Average	Read 70.6 Write 72 Mixed 69.7 53% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.27 80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 41%
Lexar uSD UHS2 RDR 32GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free, PID b055 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 203 Write 86.2 Mixed 104 147% 131 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.49 73% 4.28 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.8% Above average	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 20.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	12x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	2x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
HD 7970AMD $435Bench 36%, 6,727 samples	1x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x
840 Series 500GBSamsungBench 72%, 7,390 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 367 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $346

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16