Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	50.3% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 148 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 213 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 3 3% 3.07 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.2 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 302 308 309 311 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 339 Write 323 Mixed 297 SusWrite 308 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 33 106% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 99.2 DQ Mixed 50.5 44% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.2% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 16.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	12x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 480GBSanDisk $40Bench 53%, 16,752 samples	4x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,461 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	1x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	1x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $239

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16